I would like to share Daniel Henninger's confidence that ObamaCare is
 a doomed entitlement that will collapse under its own weight ("Let ObamaCare Collapse,"
 Wonder Land, Sept. 26), but historical precedents for an orderly 
dismantling of welfare-state benefit programs are very hard to find. Mr.
 Henninger's forecast of ObamaCare's demise hinges on public abandonment
 of the entitlement as its catastrophic effects unfold. Public disgust 
is destined to rise, according to Mr. Henninger, because the 
technological core of a centrally managed health system will be 
overloaded by a mind-boggling array of parties involved (i.e., federal 
agencies, state and local governments, employers, insurers, health-care 
providers and patients).
Many of us might agree that ObamaCare's overreach will force change 
but question whether dysfunction was baked into a plan to blame greedy 
insurers and push for a single-payer solution or if the number of voters
 who have ObamaCare buyer's remorse will exceed the number who are 
partially or fully dependent on government benefits.
 Many U.S. companies have been rushing to drop bare-bones health 
plans and to steer employees, particularly part-timers, into insurance 
exchanges. An employer stampede out of health-care administration means 
that far more Americans will be dependent on government-sponsored plans 
in the next year or two. Once dependence and entitlement settle into a 
nation's psyche, abandonment of social progress is unheard of, absent 
impending financial collapse.
As a general rule, progressive steps forward into entitlement 
minefields are usually followed by stubborn and expensive stomps to the 
finish line, not by retreats or surrender.
                John Gardner
            
                Austin, Texas
            
Allowing ObamaCare to simply collapse won't discredit the Democrats. 
Instead, it will provide an opening to increase government intrusion 
into the private economy, enable the Democrats to look bipartisan, and 
blame conservatives, while ushering in a single-payer system. When 
ObamaCare collapses Democrats will argue that the plan was based on the 
Heritage Foundation's ideas from years gone by and the experiment of a 
Republican governor of Massachusetts. Despite their belief in single 
payer during 2010, Democrats took the unprecedented step of offering a 
conservative, market-based solution instead. But alas, they will argue 
that the market has failed us yet again, and the American people are 
left with only one option to achieve the goal of caring for all 
Americans. 
The argument continues; we are compelled to offer the solution that 
we believed appropriate in 2010. Our attempt at bipartisanship was a 
mistake. Single payer will ensure that all Americans have their 
fundamental right to health care met. This is the endgame, a new 
behemoth entitlement, and the biggest expansion of government in our 
history will be accomplished. What is frightening is that if this 
argument is packaged correctly, Democrats in their failure will have won
 their ultimate prize and ensured Democrat voters for generations to 
come. 
Republicans must band together now, and make an unyielding argument 
that ObamaCare was doomed from the start, placing the blame firmly and 
squarely at the Democrats feet. We must present a viable, true 
free-market alternative to ObamaCare, which should be boldly and loudly 
announced on Oct. 1, and never speak of ObamaCare again.
                James R. Oppenhuizen
            
                Grand Rapids, Mich.
            
ObamaCare was carefully crafted to deliver its goodies upfront, while
 delaying its more painful mandates and taxes until after the 
presidential election. Recently, the president unexpectedly, but 
shrewdly, delayed the employer mandate until after the next election 
cycle, once he grasped the potential fallout from its negative impact on
 job creation. 
As we now begin to digest the price increases inherent in the health 
exchanges, I suspect that Mr. Obama will soon be quite willing to agree 
to delay the individual mandate too (perhaps in return for a 
debt-ceiling increase), thus appearing reasonable while also postponing 
the mandate's financial pain until after the midterms. All Republicans 
accomplish from this is to unwittingly provide political cover that will
 help the Democrats hold power in the Senate, while another year of 
"free" goodies further entrenches the law.
Mr. Henninger gets it exactly right. The sooner this stinker is 
completely unwrapped, the better chance we have of getting rid of it.

